<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux Automation. Any application, anywhere, anytime.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://press.redhat.com/2007/11/07/linux-automation-any-application-anywhere-anytime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://press.redhat.com/2007/11/07/linux-automation-any-application-anywhere-anytime/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:35:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad Day</title>
		<link>http://press.redhat.com/2007/11/07/linux-automation-any-application-anywhere-anytime/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 04:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.press.redhat.com/2007/11/07/linux-automation-any-application-anywhere-anytime/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Brian:

An interesting take, per above. I, like many of the Red Hat staff, am an ex-Digital employee. I would love to get your objective take (and not as a CTO marketeer) on two subjects....maybe we do this through the Nick Carr formal process, is you&#039;d prefer that avenue...

1) &quot;Linux Beyond x86&quot; (e.g. Itanium2, IBM POWER, and System Z)Does RH care much about those alternative server platform targets much, or are you just going to concede it to SuSe?

2) The System P folks seem to be running more of their Linux on POWER performance benchmark characterizations with RHEL, in particular, more recently, per the newer POWER6 server offerings? Is this part of a larger and deeper alliance with the System P folks than RH had established previously? If so, what biz and tech alliances spokes are included here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian:</p>
<p>An interesting take, per above. I, like many of the Red Hat staff, am an ex-Digital employee. I would love to get your objective take (and not as a CTO marketeer) on two subjects&#8230;.maybe we do this through the Nick Carr formal process, is you&#8217;d prefer that avenue&#8230;</p>
<p>1) &#8220;Linux Beyond x86&#8243; (e.g. Itanium2, IBM POWER, and System Z)Does RH care much about those alternative server platform targets much, or are you just going to concede it to SuSe?</p>
<p>2) The System P folks seem to be running more of their Linux on POWER performance benchmark characterizations with RHEL, in particular, more recently, per the newer POWER6 server offerings? Is this part of a larger and deeper alliance with the System P folks than RH had established previously? If so, what biz and tech alliances spokes are included here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
